1. Not yet, but isn't that what this discussion is about? So how...

1. Not yet, but isn't that what this discussion is about? So how would we make the three types of marriages be equal in terms of access to reproduction services?

2. Adopted kids are already behind given their circumstances. Now given the choice all else being equal should priority be given to hetero couples?

3. Granted, however I think many parents have not thought out the inevitable conclusions.

4. That is right but we are not talking about a adoption per say, more the deliberate removal of a biological parent for not other reason than the parents sexuality, not the unfortunate circumstance of a child given up. What rights does the child have regarding this deliberate removal?

5. No the changing of the act is a government endorsement that heterosexual couples are identical to homosexual couples. When biology dictates differently.

6. You have already said it is beneficial for both sexes to be permanent role models for children. Why would you advocate for a change in law that would mean that a priority for the beneficial scenario is denied?