gaza, now this is serious, page-42

In the past the people at the UN haven't been nuetral or truthful. It will be interesting what the truth turns out to be this time when the dust settles eg this incident
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1231424892324&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull

"Who killed the Palestinian driver of an aid truck and wounded two others as their convoy made its way into the Gaza Strip through the Erez crossing during Thursday's "humanitarian cease-fire?"

According to the foreign media, who based their information on UN sources, IDF tank shells blasted the truck. According to the Magen David Adom medic who claimed to have taken the Palestinians to an Israeli hospital, the truck actually came under Hamas sniper fire.

The medic, who asked not to be named, said he got his information from soldiers in the field, but by press time - some eight hours after the incident - the IDF Spokesman's Office was still unable to provide a response or to establish contact with the relevant sources in the field.

Adding to the confusion, the Palestinian Red Crescent Society said it had evacuated the victims, but the MDA medic said soldiers told him they had gone in, at great personal risk, to evacuate the wounded Palestinians.

What is certain is that there is one dead Palestinian, and two others being treated at Ashkelon's Barzilai Medical Center for gunshot wounds....."


example of what I am talking about re UN history - note the persistance of the red cross and HRW
http://www.zombietime.com/fraud/ambulance/
http://www.zombietime.com/fraud/ambulance/hrw/

I think one thing everyone on this post can agree on is that we all have a huge difference in fact not opinion. no point arguing opinion till you can get your facts in the same universe. ATM some are seeing black and others white for the same object completely opposite ideas of what actually has past and what is happening.