So what part of my previous post was incorrect?Makuuta has...

So what part of my previous post was incorrect?

Makuuta has ongoing costs, the GOU alone take $23kpa and you omitted all of the other ongoing costs I listed.
True or False the Chinese looked at it and went back home ~ actually to Peak who have a viable project. TRUE

So if Tim & Co have had to resort to cost cutting by cancelling the Junket, the kitty must be close to being empty,

Anyhow you should be very happy, I have just given you another excuse to drown previous comments and to now follow up with yet another page or two of your repetitive drivel.

FYI, Longonjo is progressing nicely, and you must agree it is going to be a little more substantial than Makuuta, Why ? because it is going to be a fully fledged mine producing 20,000+tpa MREC (because they do have ORE), not a Chemistry set processing a few Kklo's of dirt.