Can anyone explain how this (80% Tb and Dy extraction, from the scoping study)
turned into this, from the DFS,
So effectively 1-49/80=39% downstream losses post leaching here? A result of REE not washed from the clays + losses in impurity removal step?
Seemingly amazing headline extraction numbers shared by MEI averaging 54% NdPr, 33% DyTb extractions from diagnostic leach tests, but will these also get annihilated once the reality of needing to wash the clays to recover the REE + impurity removal losses kicks in at the scoping study??
IXR's raw extraction numbers appear excellent head to head against MEI, 80% Dy, 80% Tb vs MEI Capao average 35% Tb 31% Dy.. Investors need to be very careful comparing final recovery numbers in a DFS (IXR) against best-case laboratory diagnostic extraction numbers (MEI)... downstream losses appear to be brutal for REE clays.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- General Chat / Discussion
Can anyone explain how this (80% Tb and Dy extraction, from the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1,520 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add IXR (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
0.9¢ |
Change
-0.001(10.0%) |
Mkt cap ! $43.48M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
1.0¢ | 1.0¢ | 0.9¢ | $40.12K | 4.180M |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
49 | 19276596 | 0.9¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
1.0¢ | 4237221 | 9 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
49 | 19276596 | 0.009 |
20 | 12683756 | 0.008 |
10 | 6821314 | 0.007 |
8 | 6185000 | 0.006 |
11 | 8301711 | 0.005 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
0.010 | 4237221 | 9 |
0.011 | 11227599 | 11 |
0.012 | 3191897 | 8 |
0.013 | 6085855 | 10 |
0.014 | 2841949 | 15 |
Last trade - 11.21am 24/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
IXR (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online