Can anyone explain how this (80% Tb and Dy extraction, from the scoping study)
turned into this, from the DFS,
So effectively 1-49/80=39% downstream losses post leaching here? A result of REE not washed from the clays + losses in impurity removal step?
Seemingly amazing headline extraction numbers shared by MEI averaging 54% NdPr, 33% DyTb extractions from diagnostic leach tests, but will these also get annihilated once the reality of needing to wash the clays to recover the REE + impurity removal losses kicks in at the scoping study??
IXR's raw extraction numbers appear excellent head to head against MEI, 80% Dy, 80% Tb vs MEI Capao average 35% Tb 31% Dy.. Investors need to be very careful comparing final recovery numbers in a DFS (IXR) against best-case laboratory diagnostic extraction numbers (MEI)... downstream losses appear to be brutal for REE clays.
Can anyone explain how this (80% Tb and Dy extraction, from the...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2,204 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add IXR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.7¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $34.08M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.7¢ | 0.8¢ | 0.7¢ | $45.71K | 6.354M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | 13633161 | 0.7¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.8¢ | 5433226 | 10 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 16/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| IXR (ASX) Chart |