general chat/ thoughts, page-28

Hello Mer,

Agreed on both points.

The CR ann included other uses, other than "potential acquisition of strategic assets". I guess the point I was trying to make, was justifying why I felt the company went down the road of a CR from 708As rather than exisiting shareholders was one of a sense of urgency to wrap up the potential acquisition. I am just as frustrated as other shareholders by:
a) not being in position to participate in the cap raise at a significant discount to the share price at the time, and
b) the loss of momentum in the share price appreciation that followed that CR.


Maybe some of the companies/technologies in brine processing (and waste-to-value) would include (but not limited to):

- Lilac Solutions
- Outotek
- Veolia Water Technologies
- Simbol Materials
- Memsift Innovations
- Summit NanoTech
- Tenova (one of the processing technologies that Tesla is funding via Pure)
- POSCO's brine processing tech which they're been developing over the last 10years.
- PurLucid Treatment Solutions
- Commercialisation potential of research being undertaken at UQ, Deakin, Curtin and CSIRO

The technology platforms that these companies are utilising includes
- NanoFiltration / RO
- Ion exchange
- solvent chemical extraction

However, I do believe that the aMES technology appears to have signifiant environmental and economic advantages and coupled with our collaboration with a tier-1 partners (Worley and VU), that in my opinion provides an advantage to competing technologies.

This is just my opinion and DYOR.