To all who got a bit riled up in the chart thread, I do...

To all who got a bit riled up in the chart thread, I do apologise, that was not my intention, I much prefer a constructive discussion.

I think it all came to down to my use of the term "no value". Value in itself is very ambiguous, and I guess I don't agree when this stock is touted as a "value investment". A dividend paying blue chip is more of a value investment for me.
Future value, I believe would be a more accurate term, because TSO does have the potential to become a major. For mine, this is a speculative investment that is showing signs that it could turn into something bigger.

But I guess this all comes down to an individuals risk tolerance and what is deemed valuable.

Open for discussion. It has certainly made me think about my choice of words!