Would it be unreasonable to expect management to publicly address the changes (all negative) to inferred / grades / tonnes previously released (as gospel, under ASX guidelines) and now reassessed and re released with this announcement?
I appreciate there is a new geo looking at things but why would he have gone back over the information previously released under stringent guidelines and re assessed them? I'd like to know under whose instruction this was instigated and the big one, WHY?
Would it be unreasonable to expect management to publicly...
Add NVA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
24.0¢ |
Change
-0.015(5.88%) |
Mkt cap ! $51.11M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 25.5¢ | 25.5¢ | 24.0¢ | $2.1K | 8.704K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 21943 | 24.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 25.0¢ | 4000 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.59pm 15/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| NVA (ASX) Chart |