General Chat, page-7485

Absolutely agree that long term benefits should outweigh short term impacts and I am more than happy to ride the bumps on decisions like ore sorters for instance. I could even be comfortable with this choice, but I am more concerned that decisions such as this, if they are indeed part of a clear long term strategic plan, then there should be no need to be finding these elements under explained in market disclosures or hidden in financial statements.

I dont need every disclosure to be a "headline", in fact I wish there were less attempts to "headline" and more calm and considered choices being made.

I am trying to read the strategic review update in that light, but it comes across as a list of potential "headlines" rather than being bedded in the time-line for development which is what shareholder sreally want to know.

The very fact the time-line has shifted and yet there is no mention of how the Strategic Review has altered the time-line is a failure to address the core concerns of shareholders. Lets not be afraid to talk to the changes (positive or negative), we should gain confidence from the greater understanding and knowing what the drivers are for shifting expectations and changes of focus.