I spent one hour just now and it was all reversed almost immediately.
I think the subeditors are overzealous because the article already has too many unreferenced statements.
Yes, mentioning RAC would be a no-no.
Rather than give up, I entered the ASH 2023 Sheba paper reference; hopefully that change won't be reversed.
====
Does anyone know how to reuse an existing reference number when editing Wikipedia? When I try Cite, Re-use, and click on the existing reference the number assigned is wrong, i.e. it doesn't correspond to the existing reference. (I want to reuse Su et al, July 2020)
I spent one hour just now and it was all reversed almost...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 664 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add RAC (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$1.70 |
Change
0.090(5.59%) |
Mkt cap ! $289.5M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $1.60 | $1.76 | $1.59 | $142.7K | 84.97K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 17175 | $1.70 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $1.77 | 6060 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 05/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| RAC (ASX) Chart |