General comments, page-839

Or it could be the fact the same man that's running 6 companies have all had missed timelines by a major blowout. Maybe this deal was always going to take 1 year and they knew that, yet they chose to mislead investors by giving false dates full knowing it wouldn't be met. (refer to previous announcements in regards to the language used with the timeline). Just a possibility with no facts to back it up, one of the many thoughts that crossed my mind after being taken for a ride for 10 months. All IMO obviously.

p.s I have 0 doubt this deal will go through, just a matter of time is all. Hopefully we're all winners by the years end. GL people.