General Discussion AGY, page-17448

Still going with this are we? I thought you would let it go to save yourself the embarrassment, but apparently not. So I'll lay it out for you clearly. Let's start with what you actually said, which was "Previous qualification (of many tonnes) shows that we can make product to tight spec". See, it's right here:



Now, let's unpack your comment. When were these many tonnes of product qualified by a customer? It couldn't be YNCC. It was noted in the AGY release (17 Jun 20) that the initial customer purity testing was only part of a rigorous supplier qualification process. See, right here:



Note that it was only part of the process, and should enable progress through the rigorous supplier qualification process. Not did, not has, but should. The subsequent purchase of the 20 tonne shipment was clearly executed for YNCC to continue the supplier qualification process. And we've heard nothing since.

Now, there could be any number of reasons why nothing further was heard, but the point of the matter is that no-one has ever confirmed that AGY's product has cleared the rigorous qualification process of a customer. Your statement that AGY "previously qualified many tonnes of product" was an outright lie, plain and simple. That or you just have no idea what you are talking about.

If you put as much effort into your research as you do.your arguing, you might make some valid points. But digging in with your lies, and then trying to obfuscate with many more tangents just chips away at whatever credibility you have left.