I’m struggling to resist the urge to respond with mockery to...

I’m struggling to resist the urge to respond with mockery to those who mocked a *** version of me, but I will manage…

…I do, however, think it’s highly evident that you’re kidding yourself when you claim the pilot plant did everything it was supposed to do. One person even suggested it only needed to produce lab quantities to verify the process. What was it called again? Lab experiment? Concept demonstration? Oh, I remember… let me remind you… it was literally called… a 500 tonne per annum plant.

500 tonne

per

annum

Now, sure, I totally agree that it didn’t have to produce 500 tonnes within 12 months to be a success and do everything it was supposed to, but it never produced 500 tonnes in total, barely a tiny percentage of that, it never produced at anything remotely like a rate of growth 500 tonnes per annum either.

If you think it did everything it was supposed to, Pauline Hanson me why it was literally called a “500 tonne per annum” plant.

If you promise your staff $500k per year and you never pay them more than $30 per week and fire them without cause after a month, I think we all know they’re going to consider something is amiss and if you say you paid them everything you were supposed to, I think you know what the result will be.

Why defend people who literally called something “500 tonne per annum” which in no sense achieved what it was supposed to.