Focus rob.
The post I replied to was yours being "confused" about why I was posting and commenting on a paragraph from the qtrly report.
...and as I said:
I'm just providing some focus on the facts.
Simple.
You're tying yourself in knots.
Focus on one point/post at a time perhaps.
If you want to talk about the earlier speculation of mine wrt the "78 trials" and what I would expect to happen if they had provided "more detail" or more context", eg. "78 out of 100 trials completed", then I stand by my comments and reasoning earlier. IMO in that example, people would indeed be "concluding" how long those last 22 trials "should take", and be whining when that time "expires". The history of this forum supports this!!
Also, similarly, if the company had stated "some trials completed", some people would be shouting "that might be only 2 or 3", or "they are hiding the progress, it must be crap" etc etc.
That speculation of mine just provides some perspective, imo, and may help the other readers here understand what might happen in the future, when similar things are announced. Forewarned is forearmed! Alternatively, it might provide some food-for-thought for those others pondering why the company didn't elaborate beyond the "78 trials" comment.... I can imagine what would happen here if, say, the company published its work schedule for the rectification works, showing specific activities and dates! There is good reason they didn't. Get on the phone to Jerko if you don't understand.
Oh and the fact that you immediately throw out terms like "invented", "fantasy", "angry", "desperately", "throw mud", "making sh!t up" etc, in response to these posts is actually quite concerning, yet rather revealing, especially considering that that speculation and view was a mere side-point in the original post of mine.
Oh dear.
Focus!
Expand
(20min delay)