General Discussion AGY, page-22026

There is no mystery surrounding the "intention" of the pilot plant.

--

--

--


--

--


"Considerably reduces the associated risks for Argosy when progressing to the larger scale ~2,000tpa and ultimately ~10,000tpa operations."

People pushing this narrative that the pilot plant "didn't work", because otherwise the current issue with the filtration circuit would never have happened are failing to understand the nature and purpose of the pilot plant, or otherwise being intentionally disingenuous, afaict.


As for plans for "ongoing sales", things evolve, opportunities change, and priorities like building the 2ktpa plant clearly take precedence.
Again, if ongoing production from that plant was practical, efficient and somehow in the best interests of the company, do you really (seriously) believe that the team at Puna Mining wouldn't have been all over it? Of course they would have, and the very premise of the current chatter on this topic is clearly fundamentally flawed.

No-one is stopping any of you from contacting Puna Mining, telling them that their pilot plant "never worked", criticising them for not continuing to produce from it, and accusing them of making "zero progress" to-date on rectifying the filtration circuit issues on the 2ktpa plant.
Don't forget to report back on their response.
Thanks in advance.