General Discussion AGY, page-22212

Not to mention that at least a couple of them are/might be seeking a re-entry here in the foreseeable future, and of course want a price as low as possible - any FUD they can seed that has any chance of sucking a pip out of the sp = $$ to them.

What was also obvious was that ol’ mate mlc didn’t hammer the company over the latest announcement, as he usually does immediately with “nothing new” etc etc, as he already bought his trading parcels from 15.5-16.5c iirc, and clearly didn’t want to add any downward pressure to his trade.
So obvious, imo!

…and yes, the “stick to the facts” and “I’m here for genuine discussion” narrative from the “concerned” ex/holders is hilariously disingenuous, imo.

Imo perhaps the funniest thing of all is the insistence in the robustness of their FA/TA/analysis/judgement/assessment/etc, when it is precisely those things that have resulted in them being in the red and/or locking in considerable losses here - whilst they incorrectly but vocally assert that others must also be in the red. You just can’t make this sh!t up!