“You say here that people should avoid looking at your personal...

“You say here that people should avoid looking at your personal claims and focus on the company”

What I am saying is that the focus on my history etc is largely irrelevant to the points that I have made about the progress and prospects of the company; and that instead of making false assertions about me, which you (and others) do in order to try to discredit my posts about the company, why not actually challenge/refute those actual posts and actual points that I have presented and/or discussed?

This is an anonymous forum.
I don’t rely on my history or credentials as a basis for the points I have made, I have merely noted them a few times (over 13000+ total posts over 7 years) to provide some context to my perspective and insight to those who may be interested.

So, if you are so concerned that I’m just a “paid ramper”, how about you specifically address and refute whatever points I make that are supposedly “ramping”….? I mean, that must be easy, since it’s all just “mindless ramping” according to frenchy?!


Now, apparently, you’ll “bet good money” that I’m “not even a shareholder at all”…?

Ok, how about $1M..?
You can crowdfund from Rob and Pierre if you like.

Then we’ll go another $1M on your assertion that my avg is above 10c.


It’ll be fun.