maybe - but keep scale in mind. HM is huge. In one presentation...

maybe - but keep scale in mind. HM is huge. In one presentation JP said the whole map is basically all of Singapore. So I guess it is a difference if you have a smaller salar with 4 companies or a large salar with 4 companies. On top of that, I am sure our ExQM people thought that through as well. and it is also probably better for the environment if you exploit really good salars with more ponds/companies than less companies/ponds but across more salars, also less economical and environmentally "friendly" ones.... what's the point exploiting lower quality salars with a less positive environmental footprints - as an alternative to less exploiting of the really good salars? the world needs more lithium - it should focus on those salars with the best economics and environmental footprint. I always thought our HMW project is one of the greenest projects out there (well also because we are not refining - just delivering the liquid spodumene ). what do other think?