General discussion (MEI), page-4444

Great post. Very misleading from ARR IMO. If ARR are saying grade 5% REO, then MEI can say grade 90% REO (their MREC product), then it's apples with apples.

And I don't know how ARR claim low capex without a scoping study and with a flowsheet including:
HPGR rolls
SAG mill!
DMS circuit
Wet high intensity mag seperators (WHIMS)!
a tank leach running 90 degC and 250 kg/t acid (strong acid), might need to be made of titanium for corrosion?

Compare to MEI, dig, leach at pH 4 at ambient in carbon steel tanks and filter, completely different realm of CAPEX..

Also ARR's met work is very thin on the ground, there isn't a single table of met results on the leaching in their announcements? Compare to MEI's huge data set, hard to compare with a company that don't share the full data..