General Discussion Topics, page-106069

Hey mate, for just a moment try to forget that you hold PLL.

As a SYA shareholder, you are saying that you are completely happy with any arrangement that involves us working twice as hard for half the output, maybe even less. And you're happy to do all that work to sell half of it off for less than cost for 20 years, essentially making us slaves? As a SYA shareholder you're totally fine with that?

I think the fact that inflation was not factored in to the OTA deal is enough to indicate what the intended time span for the OTA was. PLL holders can drea
m all they like about legalities or compensation whatever, but it's all a pipedream because it requires NAL to remain a going concern, and I can't see that happening under their fantasies.