General Discussion Topics, page-1077

I think people are giving too much credit to EMC and SRG in relation to the NAL bid. Remember these companies and companies in general pride themselves on the smoke and mirrors of what they are really worth or doing? (With flamboyant statements and biographies) For those intimately aware of what SYA is about, can see SYA have quite a few strengths in the NAL bid. They/we are more astute when it comes to comparative analysis of competitors and like companies.

Then separate to that, the NAL bid isn't the 'Jesus nut' for SYA's success. It's what's in the ground in Quebec and WA (gold, lithium, gold, lithium- you get my drift).

This is further amplified with what 'new' SYA is doing in comparison to the 'old' SYA. Strategic MOU, strong relationships with local government and First Nations, letting go of the old guard, getting in the new, Evercore links, Tesla, etc, etc.

As I mentioned on this forum a few posts back. SYA is exceptionally good for mid to long term holders.