General Discussion Topics, page-116956

many of the lithium stocks have gone up by those sorts of percentages. However the MAIN difference with Sayona is the simple fact that they won the bid for the NAL assets at the front end with these ' Extraordinary ' windfall gains coming as a direct results of picking these assets up on the cheap out of receivership. No one else who has similar gains has done FAST tracked their development in this manner.

And this is even more important when viewing this ' preemptive ' acquisition with the backdrop of inflation figures these last couple of years. So again , no one has benefited from a move like this to the extent that Sayona has. One would also argue that because they have been working closely with Quebec on this project , that they would have ALSO got considerable considerations when they picked up Moblan 6 weeks after concluding the NAL acquisition.

Sayona's DFS figures for NAL are also way more conservative and a lot more tied to current Spot spodumene prices than say Sigma Lithium's projects and who has also risen in the thousands of percentage gains over the same period of time as Sayona. So Sigma's DFS is tied to an average spd price of approximately US $3,300 per tonne where Sayona's is something just over USD$1,200 per tonne. And this is why Sayona should continue to outperform overall. Because of its ' Disconnect ' to current spot spodumene prices.

In fact anything about its DFS forecast pricing should be considered almost a ' Windfall ' gain in itself provided it can deliver on the cost side at the same time.

So yeah , mate , you have NO idea what you're talking about here. Way out of your depth. And with your pet grievance on GOLD mate , I've actually received in excess of 300% returns on ASX listed gold plays in LESS than a Week never mind the 12.5% returns you didn't see coming for the shareholders at PRU. And mate , your never going to get that sort of return in the length of time ....., even in the Australian property BUBBLE......