Peeps on here realise that NAL was a perfectly working asset...

Peeps on here realise that NAL was a perfectly working asset with hundreds of millions $$$ spent on it and then failed, once, twice, why is Sayona different? Same story as before. Sayona picked up an asset for almost nothing from a company that failed. If continues at a loss then why would history not repeat itself? Getting dangerously close to a possible care and maintenance phase and a suspension from trading, frozen money and then a bigger company coming in when prices change down the track. Who knows how many years that may be?