General Discussion Topics, page-141218

What Whiskies wants everyone to believe is that by merging it breaks the current 75% x 25% of Nal and offers shareholders of Sayona a way to get more out of the deal + 25% but fails to tell everyone that by going down that street Sayona would be giving away 50% of all their current tenements possibly worth billions in the future to a company that brings nothing but a leaches attitude to any potential merger...l have challenged Whiskies before many times about how much Sayona and its shareholders would be decimated by any such rubbish as a merger and not once has he ever given any answer as to why it would be beneficial to anyone but Piedmont when one assesses what the 2 parties have to offer in the medium to long term...if anybody wants to take the time and research what the company's have that show what they bring and it benefits both sides l to would be happy to entertain it but from our current positions an imho they Piedmont have nothing that benefits any shareholder of Sayona.