General Discussion Topics, page-141725

If you think doing that is reasonable then by all means do so.

Putting my text is italics as I'm just cutting and pasting some snippets from some posters.



Unfortunately no ....



and then


I did and they weren't.

and we have


Well the surprise part is right - that's for sure.

And we also had this posted



NO IT DOES NOT HAVE TOO.. Yes producing more tonnes lowers your FIXED COST per tonne. But if you variable costs are inflating higher then that is not always the case - surprise surprise - noting higher reagent costs and labour for example.





Mill utilisation and recovery were Qtr highlights ... but even with those, costs came down only marginally ... NAL's high cost of production really has the spotlight upon it at present ... it has to be brought down using whatever means necessary ... otherwise it becomes the marginal cost producer in a general supply sense ... a big beneficiary if and when 2-tiered pricing for IRA compliant material arrives.

Well see how well this fares in the coming weeks