General Discussion Topics, page-148849

And if the Canadians of any of the G7 member's for that matter ...., or even the Australians were ' Serious ' enough to so call " protect our economic and national security " whilst at the same time locking in a more true and fair value on the cost of mining ......

Well , a good place to start might be by linking our Investment markets vis a vis investors to the tax system a little bit more than say just the flow through system. So I'm speaking more about the Canadians here . But if you were to say link an ' additional ' tax credit ....to the definitive increase in your ' Proven ' reserves from the measured and an amount commensurate with the movement in your Indicated to Probable categories. This would inherently put a ' Value ' on not only the exploration dollars required but ALSO the higher value which would be ascribed to a LARGER growing resource.

This would not only encourage more Investors to the critical minerals sector who might be chasing more ' Flow Through ' attachments for their tax ....( at the discretion of the Company of course ) , but as the scheme grew in confidence with the markets , it would also have a trickle up ....or down ( whichever way you want to look at it ) of a value which is required to get it out of the ground and hence a price for the product......or at least perhaps OUR market .....a secondary market where as the supply chain grows , there are also tax concessions and deterrents for NOT buying any inputs which are NOT coming from the domestically sources products.