And if the Canadians of any of the G7 member's for that matter...

And if the Canadians of any of the G7 member's for that matter ...., or even the Australians were ' Serious ' enough to so call " protect our economic and national security " whilst at the same time locking in a more true and fair value on the cost of mining ......

Well , a good place to start might be by linking our Investment markets vis a vis investors to the tax system a little bit more than say just the flow through system. So I'm speaking more about the Canadians here . But if you were to say link an ' additional ' tax credit ....to the definitive increase in your ' Proven ' reserves from the measured and an amount commensurate with the movement in your Indicated to Probable categories. This would inherently put a ' Value ' on not only the exploration dollars required but ALSO the higher value which would be ascribed to a LARGER growing resource.

This would not only encourage more Investors to the critical minerals sector who might be chasing more ' Flow Through ' attachments for their tax ....( at the discretion of the Company of course ) , but as the scheme grew in confidence with the markets , it would also have a trickle up ....or down ( whichever way you want to look at it ) of a value which is required to get it out of the ground and hence a price for the product......or at least perhaps OUR market .....a secondary market where as the supply chain grows , there are also tax concessions and deterrents for NOT buying any inputs which are NOT coming from the domestically sources products.