They purchased 25% of a company (sayona quebec) not 25% of any one asset. As the company grows and adds assets they still own 25% of the company. They also are responsible for 25% of the expenses which is why they paid 25% of the up front cash needed to acquire NAL.
General Discussion Topics, page-31458
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 112,167 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SYA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
2.6¢ |
Change
-0.002(7.14%) |
Mkt cap ! $267.6M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 2.8¢ | 2.8¢ | 2.6¢ | $286.5K | 10.70M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | 7497011 | 2.6¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 2.7¢ | 5105482 | 13 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 13/09/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYA (ASX) Chart |