To sum up this post, if we can get kilns away from diesel/gas, yes I certainly agree mining will be more energy intensive than downstream processing. However, the next question becomes is the capex spend for using kilns that are not gas/diesel fired in producing carbonate/hydroxide competitive to kilns that are gas/diesel fired as this is a key in bankable studies and in NPV/feasibility studies. Reading about the Calix technology, for example, PLS certainly thinks it can be very competitive capex wise to traditional technologies so that can only be a positive on reducing CO2 emissions in production if such green technologies do work effectively at scale.
All IMO
General Discussion Topics, page-48614
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 93,363 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SYA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.0¢ |
Change
-0.001(3.23%) |
Mkt cap ! $308.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.0¢ | 3.1¢ | 3.0¢ | $655.3K | 21.50M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 131 | 33563667 | 3.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.1¢ | 503427 | 5 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 02/08/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYA (ASX) Chart |