You are obviously listening to the usual suspects and not to the...

You are obviously listening to the usual suspects and not to the real scientists. Richard Lindzen is arguably the most respected atmospheric physicist on the planet. He does not support the hypothesis of a climate emergency based on the effect of CO2 in the atmosphere. Neither do Happer, Spencer, Christie, Soon, Plimer, Currie, Morner, Carter Lomborg, and at least another 600 scientists involved in the climate sphere who have submitted a letter stating so. It may also surprise many that the IPCC in spite of their alarmist summary do not support the scenario of a climate emergency. If you delve into the science it is advisable to research all the science. There is a long way to go before any of it is 'settled'. For whatever motivations, right or wrong, it appears fossil fuels are on the way out and IMO the only effective replacement currently available is nuclear , supported to a lesser degree by Li for EV's and regional storage. So whether we are so called alarmists or sceptics we will all be heading in the same direction. IMO