I am not sure whether than statements mean (devil lies in the details?)
1. NAL - 100% to Sayona Quebec (in which Sayona Mining owns 75%, Piedmont owns 25%) or
2. NAL - 75% to Sayona Quebec (in which Sayona Mining owns 75%, Piedmont owns 25%), 25% to Piedmont or
3. NAL - 75% to Sayona Mining, 25% to Piedmont
I personally think it is (1), as they would likely be dealing with a Canadian legal entity Sayona Quebec and not Piedmont (US entity) or Sayona Mining (AUS entity).
General Discussion Topics, page-6690
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 135,058 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add SYA (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
3.1¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $319.0M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 3.1¢ | 3.3¢ | 3.1¢ | $657.2K | 20.80M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 24 | 4663949 | 3.1¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2¢ | 2145533 | 6 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 26/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| SYA (ASX) Chart |