General Discussion Topics, page-74110

Wait a minute and don´t forget these details: PLL promised to explore Gaston County as their Li-mine and to build a chemical plant to downstream the SC6 from NAL. But Keith "forgot" to ask for all permissions. So PLL saved the money for the chemical plant at least but insists to be delivered with cheap SC6. ( so called windfall-profit )
And PLL makes unforeseen profits with the increased share price ( so called windfall-profit )
and: "Now fast forward a couple of years" no, this happened after SYAQ won the NAL Bid last year in summer.
If you are the CEO of SYA and are beholden to creating value for your shareholders - would you not pursue both, the path of creating max. value for your shareholders by reminding the JV partner of its violation of the original agreements?