General Discussion Topics, page-80465

We're all good. A vague, blanket statement like the one I made doesn't constitute the C word. It might embody the sentiments of it, but it doesn't fit the legal definition.

(For what it's worth, had people read my flippant comment and thought "hell yeah, I'm tired of this, let's stick it to them" and not replied to me directly, nor commented in general, then decided to run with whatever changes to their trading activities they saw fit when next reviewing their position and long and short term goals... that also wouldn't have met the legal definition).

Not to say I wouldn't have been on the receiving end of a stern chat, but whatcha gonna do. Brain tumour, no filter, remember?

Anyway, I'd have had to have been much more specific, engaged with other parties, agreed upon a plan of attack when/what/how and with who etc. And you'd have to be an idiot to do that with ASIC having free reign over HC's data base, which we're all well aware of, hence the shorters instos using encrypted messaging apps like WhatsApp, signal etc.

You'd be surprised how ferociously (some of) these messaging apps protect their users' data. Unless it involves child s%x offences, rape or homicide, Snapchat for example won't hand over a thing to law enforcement. Not a thing. I guess their livelihood hangs on their users trusting their data is safe.

I'll finish wash... I'm not saying a bad word about our lovely regulatory bodies. Great job it is they do. Highly efficient. Will stop at nothing to see the ASX kept an even playing field for all. We're lucky to have them. Blessed even.