General Discussion Topics, page-86569

I agree with most of what you are saying oilman01. I believe we would never have gotten NAL if it weren't for Piedmont backing us. I have owned Sayona since before the deal. I waited month after month while the court kept delaying the sale. I didn't have much confidence that Sayona would pull it off. The delays kept making me feel that the court was stalling to allow more & more companies jump into a bidding war. Maybe I am wrong or maybe I'm right. We may never know.
I believe Sayona could renegotiate their deal with Piedmont just as Piedmont did with Tesla. But (here me out), only if they thought that Piedmont was not a true PARTNER, just a (at the moment) business deal. It seems at the moment that they get along well & probably have a PLAN in place for both to prosper. I am hoping this is the case as I am someone who believes a deal is a deal. I am hoping that the PLAN is revealed shortly so both of us can prosper abundantly.
Just for transparency sake, I do not own any Piedmont stock. I own a big chunk (as defined by a middle class paper company employee) of Sayona, though. I would like all of us to prosper. With my bad back, I would like to retire in 3-5 years. GLTAH.