General Discussion Topics, page-89455

No, with all due respect, you were not, and if you were, you phased it very badly indeed:
"It looks to me that it is exactly what the research from Cannacord(assho&$s and the corporate trusted advisors for SYA) were concerned about, SYA being late on their production schedule with another round of capital funding needed - music to the shorters ears. With a direct phone line to the company, it is likely they know more than the rest of us. So disappointing!"

I would strongly recommend you retract this as it is very misleading indeed and in fact appears more to be an attempt to spread defamatory false information. Why are you saying there is another round of capital funding needed as if that has somehow been confirmed?? This is entirely untrue. You are passing this off as some kind of fact on a public forum.


And also, no, it is not the reason for Canaccord's BS sell recommendation. I strongly suggest you read the actual report instead of making wild speculations and passing them off as fact.

The report was actually posted here a few days ago - Canaccord's sell rating was based on very low production numbers, PLL offtake distribution uncertainty and conservative pricing - all of which has now been dispelled entirely imo by the recent investor presentation where all of the uncertainty regarding NAL production and shipping, JV distribution etc was very clearly put to bed. ThIs immediately made their report look rather daft imo.


You should be very careful about attempting to start false negative rumours about companies and peoples investments, it could be regarded as defamation.