Useful disagreement requires an actual reasoned point that is...

Useful disagreement requires an actual reasoned point that is factually based, not just emotional trolling that serves to create havoc without consequence.

And defending the right to have an alternative position is not the same as defending someone whose motives are transparent as glass. That’s niaive.

I have not observed any critical thinking in this discourse. Rather than wax lyrical on philosophical nonsense you might like to address the actual content of the discussion. Save your intellectual rhetoric for someone else because it’s boring to me and adds no value without addressing the motives of those who post without any redeeming merit.