General discussion, page-17426

No problems with posting publicly available information.
If Sud is found guilty of fraud, I'm sorry but the rational response for a holder of IHL stock would be to be relieved he hasn't been with the company for quite a while now. None of this indicates any fraudulent behaviour on the part of Incannex, and yet that's exactly the inferences you were keen to make here. I'm not telling you what you think: I'm telling you what you've written here. I didn't make you do that. You did it all on your own... LOL

I couldn't care less what the deal is with IRX... not a holder, and it doesn't reflect on IHL in any meaningful way... only just barely fodder for conspiracy-theory minded folks, and perhaps that's you.

Yes, I bought and buy the narrative of Incannex, but more importantly, I bought facts. There are concrete results that you seem quite keen to not discuss or take into account... strange for a holder, but again, you're allowed to be strange! You'd even be allowed to not hold, while claiming to hold!

The costly trials that have already been completed yielded very positive results. Want to dabble in some conspiracy theories involving falsified results in cahoots with the trial management companies? Or maybe you care to indulge in a bit of creative fantasy about Robert Clarke or some of the other prominent figures from the sectors we are involved in, and why they have joined the business? I mean, while we're having fun?

You don't lose money on a going concern until you sell, so you thinking I've lost a lot of money with IHL is light comedy fare. I haven't sold and have no intention of doing so. I suppose that's also why you haven't sold: you're smarter than you're letting on.

If I called you a downramper, it would have been because you were downramping - my purchases and what I paid per share at any given time have nothing to do with your downramping, although I do understand that you would like to make it about me being wrong to invest, and you being right to downramp, simply because the SP is currently in an uninspiring place. If you're a trader and are only interested in the short term trajectory of the stock, more power to you. But you do more than simply prognosticate on where the SP is heading. Case in point, today you argue speciously that the company seems to have used a fraudulent narrative. Own your downramping, mate. There's no point in trying to deny what is plain for every one to see. Perhaps you can glean some grim satisfaction from the current state of the SP, but it might be short lived considering pivotal trials for our flag asset start soon, and the uncertainty event horizon of moving off the ASX to the NASDAQ will probably soon be behind us.