I enjoyed the theatrical opening lines, i was very much looking forward to the rest of the story, but was disappointed when it turned into an amateurish mess of a post that i wouldn't expect from someone who studied corporation and criminal law, including defamation and malice.
It was a whole lot of research and nothing much said.
I do wonder why that was moderated and not their previous post, which was supposed evidence the BOD mislead shareholders, when in fact Sapporo misread the company statement.
Although its obvious Sapporo has an agenda, stemming from another thread, i agree the post should not have been moderated..
He/she should be able to throw ideas around, as long as they arent objectively false.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- IHL
- General discussion
General discussion, page-19208
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 720 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
FWD
Queensland's housing crisis an opportunity for ASX builder Fleetwood – and taxpayer cash a safe harbour from the storm
RNU
Renascor wins a funding boost given it wants to produce a critical mineral – but $5M award pales in comparison to some