Is this the same Murrio that commented 'great work, the statement is demonstrably false, as you have just proved' on Sapporos recent in depth post, where Sapporo stated they have a background in Law and told the reader to 'look very carefully', implying the company statement was false, and questioned the BOD intentions and whether they'd tried to mislead shareholders, showing highlighted screenshots and links as supposed evidence.
All that and the error was with Sapporo, who misread the company statement, which was factually correct.
I like reading opposing views, and i appreciate good information, if its accurate.
I'd like to add, the reason for the NASDAQ listing is the 'potential' for a market cap greater than what is 'potentially' achievable on the ASX.
It's unrealistic to think that would transpire directly post redomocile.
