1. In relation to your last question, do not try to attack my...

1. In relation to your last question, do not try to attack my personal competency unless you are prepared for 1000x return.

2. Yes, March 2024 was the expectation based on NAIF. I am not sure how many times you want to raise that. NAIF funding is concessional. In absence of NAIF funding, the company had to go through the process with commercial lenders like everyone else.

3. Consultants may bring value in areas where expertise is highly specialised (i.e. R&D, cross-country taxation) or connections are required (i.e. recent PWC scandal) to sway the government. Consultants are of limited to no value in a vanilla commercial process like debt funding by non-government entity. It's obvious that they need security and proof of cashflows to secure any debt. A consultant cannot speed up or alter a process when there were no cashflows or security.

4. Of course there are CFOs who are CFOs in the name only, and require handholding from consultants about everything because they are grossly incompetent. This is not the case here based on evidence. They have done an outstanding job so far in capital management given the circumstances.

Just because you are unhappy that not all stars aligned at the same time and it would take longer to enjoy the investment return, is a testament to your impatience and not the company management.