@@fooca re #: 69435183You seem to be under the impression...

@@fooca re #: 69435183

You seem to be under the impression 'righteous' is a wholly negative term.
It isn't, nor was it intended to be in my post. More to the first meaning below.



I'd like nothing better to sack the lot of them, and give a couple of them a proper thrashing tbh. (not the ones there presently)
But more than that, I want my money back, and it's my judgement keeping the one guy who knows what the hell is happening around for a little while - will increase the chances of that happening. That's all.

To my mind if your group have a majority on the Board (which I've voted for) - you'll get your intended outcome even with Fraser around to tell you what has been happening. And you won't put any pressure on two wholly inexperienced, but well meaning shareholders to figure out what the hell is going on, and what to do about it without at least some experience in the building.


You seem to be taking all this interaction with the BOD personally by the tone of your post. I don't care if you're angry. You getting revenge for their poor behaviour doesn't get my money back. That's literally all I care about - and why I'm voting to keep Fraser around for the time being.