General discussion, page-160

First 160 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Red Baron

3,990 Posts.

6700

06/10/21

11:05

Post #: 56597964
Share

Originally posted by ozblue: ↑

On Tuesday a nearby company Tietto Minerals will release their DFS. This is of interest for Firefinch holders as it gives a very rough idea of what the Gold side of our business is worth.

TIE have an indicated resource of 35Mt at 1.5g/t so roughly comparable to ours, even though a little light on. The most interesting aspect of their DFS will be the cap cost of building their processing plant. My rough guess would be $A300m for a 3Mt/a plant giving them production of ~130,000oz/a at 90% recovery.

The Mcap of TIE is $173m currently and assuming a slight increase after the release of DFS up to say $200m. This gives a total 'value' of their project $A200m Mcap + $A300m of $A500m for just a gold mine and some good ground, but a smaller plant and resource than ours..

I expect some differences to what I've worked out above, but will be reading their DFS with interest and following their Mcap as well.

If their numbers do eventuate something close to above, then it will amplify how cheap Firefinch currently is, as the market is still undervaluing the Goulamina resource and JV deal by a long way. I'm pretty certain our lithium side of the company is worth a whole lot more than the current ~$42.5m, if the above numbers were close.

I have no interest in TIE other than the comparison numbers/value, but I am looking forward to their release on Tuesday..

Expand

Another W African explorer with a healthy market cap of $331m is Predictive PDI.ax
They are almost next door in Guinea, have no PFS, DFS or infrastructure, just a resource of 3.65m oz @ 1.56g/t

That's bigger than our 2.4m @ 1.5 however all their resource is in the inferred category with no resource let alone all the other infrastructure & production we have.

So based on their $331m market cap, what would you value Morilla at?

FFX Price at posting: 60.3¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
18 Upvote

4 Great analysis

Reply