Not saying it isnt but the claim without facts or evidence was Lithium was looking strong off the back of the china lithoum probe, pricing, like real fundamental pricing doesnt support the claim.
If poster here are going to hold negative views to such a high burden of proof they should also apply that standard to positive views. AJM holders insisted on existing in an echo chamber and it resulted in extensive capital destruction, the same 50c bullish buyer will still claim they are right went the now heavily diluted holding are trading at a fraction of a cent.
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
