Morningstar is admittedly something of a "robo valuation" but to their credit they have a systematic, quantitative framework that they apply across all stocks they cover. And the bot spits out evident data-derived truths, like "VMT is significantly undervalued".
Now, do we really have "Zero Moat"? What is evident to me is that setting up global distribution networks takes years of hard work, and that acts as a moat for VMT to my estimate.
I think I saw that other broker note you allude to. Looked like trend-following, "monkey see, monkey do" type stock tips to me. We're probably better off without that sort of coverage.
General Discussion, page-1936
Add VMT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
15.5¢ |
Change
-0.010(6.06%) |
Mkt cap ! $64.52M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 16.0¢ | 16.0¢ | 15.0¢ | $6.635K | 41.91K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12880 | 14.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 15.5¢ | 48006 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 30/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
15.5¢ |
Change
-0.010 ( 6.06 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 16.0¢ | 16.0¢ | 15.5¢ | 4950 | ||
| Last updated 15.00pm 30/05/2024 ? | |||||
| VMT (ASX) Chart |