General Discussion, page-1735

yes a good post -a realistic overview.

For those that have been supportive for a number of years, one would assume that the larger number of LTH’s (inclusive of moi) don’t own a few hundred thousand shares but a million plus. And R E D would be the unfortunate outcome thus far.

with a Market Capitalisation sub $20m we have a lot to prove as a growth company of the future.
As many have pitched we are under-valued but largely based on unrealised potential.
The market rarely gets it wrong. We are valued today based on our financial performance .

Drip fed commercialisation and monetisation will not cut it in a demanding and uncertain investment climate. This has been talked up for some years now, but VC Funds, Private Equity & larger listed tech companies are not on the register & are not knocking on the door. We are consigned by the market as ‘experimental’.

Roadmaps sound great but with underlying slow progress becomes Management speak for “want to keep my job for another 12 months”.

Small steps from my point of view represents mediocrity. Successful tech growth stories are generally characterised by rapid development and impressive uptake or adoption of a platform. More significantly, they do not have market caps of sub $20m. Generally Cap Raises of legitimate tech growth companies are not followed by 30-50% diminishing market value either..

just stating a LTH opinions on why we are where we are. As declared on past posts, have not considered a part or full sale of holdings. Disappointed Y E S but giving them some further time to prove otherwise.

Poor newsflow is not a great sign for a company with so much promise. Please surprise us Idan.