General Discussion, page-3481

I understand the methodical progress Idan is making with the UNT technology.

Spending is under control and the developments are slow and measured.

However, there are concerns IMO.

This space is moving fast - talking avatars are appearing all over the internet.

A couple of issues - if one major player takes UNT on board, they will then "own" the company and UNT will have all its eggs in one basket and thus be "controlled". One major customer hands over ownership of the UNT business model. They will want the right to develop and control its use in their time.

The second issue is rapid development seems to be taking place in the avatar AI space - and that may bring in serious players in their own right.

If they continue to take the "cottage industry" approach, will they be left behind by a major entrant with many millions to spend..

The only way Idan can be successful is to be ahead of the pack with 'talking heads' that apply to multiple industries in multiple languages using AI language that can be rolled out on demand with the use of UNT technologies to multiple global customers

Technology is not a static medium waiting for a fledging company to become part of the commercial arena in its own time.