to me, LPD has to stick with a licensing model (If the tech is as good as they say it is)
but why has LPD only got one license agreement to date. What happened? To me something just doesn’t seem right
Commercial due diligence has resulted in zero funding deals for LPD to progress their currently known business model
DFC unlikely to approve funds if downstream feasibility has a certain likelihood of failure or a high likelihood of poor outcomes
why was the sensitivity analysis waaaaaaay out. Who got this soooo badly wrong
General Discussion, page-917
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 138 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add LPD (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
0.2¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $17.17M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 176 | 202034476 | 0.2¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 0.3¢ | 108832658 | 59 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.12pm 12/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| LPD (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable