WA1 (ASX) General discussion

Originally posted by jcmyck ↑

Hi chaps, appreciate the content here. I'm a WA1 holder. Not a mining specialist, but I have tried to piece together a crude back-of-the-envelope valuation by peer comparison with CBMM. Sources and numbers included. Let me know if anything is way off.

CBMM produced 90kt Ferroniobium in 2021. (CBMM 2021 Sustainability Report)

This equals 60kt Niobium. (FeNb is 2/3 Niobium by mass).

CBMM “Net revenue” 11.4b BRL ~ $2.4b. (CBMM 2021 Sustainability Report; I’ve not seen CBMM’s “Net” clearly defined anywhere.)

Market price of Niobium is ~$45k/t, which would give $2.7b Net Revenue for 60kt Niobium, so this roughly ties out.

CBMM “Net income” is 4.5b BRL ~ $.9b. (CBMM 2021 Sustainability Report)

CBMM pay a 25% net income royalty to Codemig (Minas Gerais); in 2021 this was 1.5b BRL, i.e. the “Net income” in the CBMM Sustainability Report has this amount deducted already. (Codemig)

i.e. true Araxa “Net income” was 6b BRL ~ $1.2b, split 75/25 between CBMM and Codemig. And true net margin is ~50%.

CBMM sold 30% at $13b valuation in 2011. (BNAmericas)

In today’s dollars, neglecting the significant production scaling, current valuation would be $19b = 29b AUD = 90B BRL.

I.e. price to sales with CBMM’s “Net revenue” of 8, price to earnings “Net income" ratio of 20. The price to sales ratio here is egregiously high for the industry, but so is the margin, such that the price to earnings ratio is reasonable.

—

Let’s assume WA1 is to produce 20kt Niobium. Using the same numbers as current CBMM (bold assumption, obviously), net income $.4b (assuming no royalty), valuation of $8b = 12.3b AUD. In simple terms, 1/3 * CBMM sale price * 4/3 as no profit sharing with Codemig.

Discount this six years into the future @ 10% => 6.5b AUD current valuation.

Obviously there will be an additional dilution factor for share price from equity and debt rounds. Lots of additional uncertainty in both directions e.g. in the positive direction, jurisdiction, potentially multipolar future, additional production/industry scaling in the future (e.g. niobium oxide). In the negative direction, potential price deflation in an oversupplied scenario (CBMM nameplate capacity 150kt I believe), remaining uncertainty around metallurgy, recovery rates, margins may be lower than CBMM. Reasonable to assume a ~50% uncertainty in the valuation.

—

As a sanity check, my estimate of the in situ value: 2.23 MT @ 1.46% = 150b AUD (highlights: 1.24 MT @ 2.82%). So, the above valuation would be ~4.4% of in situ resource value. Doesn't seem unreasonable. Typical in situ estimation doesn't really seem appropriate for this resource, given A. It overestimates as the total tonnage greatly exceeds an amount which is likely to be mined within a reasonable lifetime (discount) window of, say, 30 years, B. It underestimates as a high grade niobium deposit should have materially better margin / economics than a typical mine for which this estimate method is used.

(Here’s the crude in situ arithmetic, assuming s.g. of 2.8: .2km*.2km*depth (m)*2.8 tonnes / m^3 * grade = niobium (MT), summed over [depth, grade] for each 200m*200m spaced hole, using the overall numbers and the "Including" highlight depths WA1 gives (see e.g. here; I did this a few releases ago so it’s missing a few updates i.e. underestimating)).

Expand

Did I read this correctly that you are saying our likely MRE will be 1.46% Nb2O5 @ 153Mt?

Is this conservative or over optimistic estimate?

Cheers.

No.	Vol.	Price($)
1	1896	$15.35

No.

Vol.

Price($)

1896

$15.35

Price($)	Vol.	No.
$15.40	2726	1

Price($)

Vol.

No.

$15.40

2726

No.	Vol.	Price($)
1	1896	15.350
1	634	15.340
1	2000	15.300
1	4369	15.290
1	37	15.240

No.

Vol.

Price($)

1896

15.350

634

15.340

2000

15.300

4369

15.290

15.240

Price($)	Vol.	No.
15.400	2726	1
15.440	2365	1
15.800	200	1
15.860	64	1
15.870	343	1

Price($)

Vol.

No.

15.400

2726

15.440

2365

15.800

200

15.860

15.870

343

(20min delay)
Last $15.35		Change 0.490(3.30%)		Mkt cap ! $995.6M

Open	High	Low	Value	Volume
$14.99	$15.85	$14.96	$8.546M	553.7K

Did I read this correctly that you are saying our likely MRE...

$550 million Jabiluka uranium offer comes unstuck as Government rules lease won't be renewed

Brine and shine: Arizona Lithium wins early stage eco approval to commence wellpad #2 at Prairie

Invictus banks US$5M from Zimbabwean investment fund in support of Cabora Bassa

Biome unveils three year revenue target up to $85M – but are 3Y targets enough to excite?

PAM secures high-grade Chilean copper play in strong territory

Featured News

Buyers (Bids)

Sellers (Offers)

Featured News

Did I read this correctly that you are saying our likely MRE...

Top Stories

$550 million Jabiluka uranium offer comes unstuck as Government rules lease won't be renewed

Brine and shine: Arizona Lithium wins early stage eco approval to commence wellpad #2 at Prairie

Invictus banks US$5M from Zimbabwean investment fund in support of Cabora Bassa

Biome unveils three year revenue target up to $85M – but are 3Y targets enough to excite?

PAM secures high-grade Chilean copper play in strong territory

Featured News

Buyers (Bids)

Sellers (Offers)

Featured News