Hi Wurlitch, the in situ calculation I included is just raw niobium content, and the main peer comparison calculation is just assuming a fixed future WA1 niobium production (20kt/y) and inferring a valuation from CBMM multiples (and so implicitly their margins, recovery rates, etc. which, as I mentioned, is a bold assumption).
I don't have much to offer in regards to a direct estimate of the recovery rate. I appreciated the production paper you linked the other day, and I've found a smattering of other information available online (e.g. the NioCorp presser recently boasting a 90% recovery rate, likely a Hail Mary for their flagging stock, and this old CBMM publication which appears to claim a 96-97% recovery rate?). I've seen far lower number mentions mooted, possibly including your estimates. As I said, it appears to be a big uncertainty factor, which hopefully will be resolved positively. Cheers!
General discussion, page-4159
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5,966 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Add WA1 (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
$21.15 |
Change
-0.150(0.70%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.297B | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| $21.00 | $21.40 | $20.59 | $4.747M | 225.5K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | 1621 | $21.00 |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| $21.15 | 9990 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 16.10pm 05/07/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
| WA1 (ASX) Chart |