Hi Wurlitch, the in situ calculation I included is just raw niobium content, and the main peer comparison calculation is just assuming a fixed future WA1 niobium production (20kt/y) and inferring a valuation from CBMM multiples (and so implicitly their margins, recovery rates, etc. which, as I mentioned, is a bold assumption).
I don't have much to offer in regards to a direct estimate of the recovery rate. I appreciated the production paper you linked the other day, and I've found a smattering of other information available online (e.g. the NioCorp presser recently boasting a 90% recovery rate, likely a Hail Mary for their flagging stock, and this old CBMM publication which appears to claim a 96-97% recovery rate?). I've seen far lower number mentions mooted, possibly including your estimates. As I said, it appears to be a big uncertainty factor, which hopefully will be resolved positively. Cheers!
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- General discussion
Hi Wurlitch, the in situ calculation I included is just raw...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 5,357 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add WA1 (ASX) to my watchlist
|
|||||
Last
$17.27 |
Change
-2.080(10.8%) |
Mkt cap ! $1.059B |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
$19.60 | $19.80 | $17.00 | $8.650M | 477.3K |
Buyers (Bids)
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 2910 | $17.20 |
Sellers (Offers)
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
$17.30 | 820 | 2 |
View Market Depth
No. | Vol. | Price($) |
---|---|---|
1 | 2910 | 17.200 |
1 | 232 | 17.160 |
1 | 580 | 17.090 |
1 | 17 | 17.000 |
1 | 202 | 16.980 |
Price($) | Vol. | No. |
---|---|---|
17.440 | 306 | 1 |
17.470 | 1000 | 1 |
17.500 | 4000 | 1 |
17.520 | 1000 | 1 |
17.530 | 700 | 1 |
Last trade - 16.10pm 21/06/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
Featured News
WA1 (ASX) Chart |
The Watchlist
FHE
FRONTIER ENERGY LIMITED
Adam Kiley, CEO
Adam Kiley
CEO
SPONSORED BY The Market Online